Suryakant
Tripathi ‘Nirala’ (1899-1961) was part of a literary movement in Hindi called
‘Chhayavad’ which has been translated as both Romanticism and Mysticism. He was
born and brought up in today’s West Bengal and has exposure to literary
personalities and tendencies of Bangla. He was influenced by the religiosity of
Vivekanand and Ramkrishna Paramahamsa whose writing and uttering has been
translated by him in Hindi. He has learnt from practical Vedanta of Vivekanand
to look poor, downtrodden and outcastes with a sense of respect. He was a poet
who has experimented with poetry in each of his collections and has exhausted
almost whole range of language in poetry starting from Sanskritised language to
it’s colloquial form even to the extent of making it non-poetry. One of his
classical poems ‘Ram ki Shakti-poojaa’ has followed Ramkatha of Krittivas
Ramayan in which Ram is more humane and worried about his wife Sita. Another
one, ‘Saroj-smriti’ in spite of being an elegy has humorous prose pieces
describing the sorrow of girl’s father in searching suitable match for her.
Some of his poetry is made of meaningless words.
Though he
lived during pre and post independence period, Independence movement finds
resonance in his writing in a suggestive way. His prose writings include a
semiautobiographical depiction of a homo sexual and outcast character ‘Kulli
Bhat’ who turns into local level leader of Congress campaign. He wrote a story
titled ‘Devi’ (can be translated as deity) about a dumb beggar woman living on
foot path. He was a writer who did not write anything in simple style and thus
almost all of his pieces need some clarification and explanation, some of which
will be attempted during presentation. His poetry communicates not only by the
word meaning but he also tried to utilize sound of words to communicate, which
may be clear by rendering of his poetic pieces.
This
presentation is part of a larger project defending literary personalities of
modern Hindi literature in the face of their portrayal as revivalists.
what could be the possible psychological reason behind the writing poetry in difficult words?? may be his own understanding of thought could be so unclear that made it difficult. or it may be his struggle with words??????
ReplyDelete